JOHN RIDLEY... GIVE US A BREAK
Felix Vasquez Jr.

 

I never do this, I never respond to op ed pieces on the internet mainly because I feel that if an online writer wants to voice their opinions on something valid in film and entertainment, then they should be given the platform. Whether it's arguing the merits of "Disaster Movie" to discussing who they want in the next "Batman" movie as the villains, I think they should just be given the time to be heard.

But something disturbed me while I was cruising IMDB Hitlist and reading an article by influential writer John Ridley for NPR entitled "Minorities Get Little Respect On The Big Screen" that just shocked me. Not only is Ridley's article an affront to summer movies and a sheer paranoid delusion that prompted Ridley to take all of the minority roles from the summer movie season and completely devalue them by brandishing them as offensive.


Sounds like he's just complaining to complain right? No, Ridley says. In an interesting admission of guilt though he insists: "Now, maybe you think this is just complaining to complain."

Yes Ridley, you're complaining to complain, and I'd be complaining to complain if I wondered why you never called attention to the lack of hispanic roles this summer in the movies. I mean, where my rice and bean eating brothers and sisters out there?! Oh yes, there were some and I'll list them in a little while, but just to show you that Ridley is just complaining to complain. And to completely side track for a moment, likening this summer's slew of minority roles in the notion that it "Couldn't have been any more offensive if they released the director's cut of Birth of a Nation. On Blu-ray" is just absurd.

Now Ridley is just pushing buttons to proclaim an outrageous stance that will grind his audiences gears, how else to explain that he felt one of the better roles of the summer was Robert Downey Jr. in black face? And while it's working (credit to you Mr. Ridley), I think he also needs to be corrected. Am I just getting riled up over nothing? Is Ridley just not seeing clearly? Or is he attempting Onionesque satire?

So now to completely disprove Ridley, I'll explain some of his ridiculous assumptions with the minority roles and deconstruct his faulty reasoning while pointing out some notable minority performances this summer he conveniently ignored.

1. Jack Black was cast in "Kung Fu Panda" not as a form of mimicking or mocking Asian American culture, but because he's big and fat. They wanted an appeal to an American audience, so they cast an American comedy actor. While I'd love to say that there's nothing wrong with that, there's also no
incidence of racism there. So by your logic if there were a story about an American bear and he was played by Jackie Chan, that'd be racist?

2. Mike Myers didn't particularly flog Hindu and Indian stereotypes so much as make a tribute to his friend Deepak Chopra who, up until a few months ago, didn't mind it. Not to mention Myers regurgitated some his same racial shticks in "The Love Guru" as he did in the "Austin Powers" films. The only thing offensive about his role was that it wasn't funny and that Myers presumed his shticks were still welcomed.

3. And then you credit Will Smith for providing what I called "His version of Superman for his fans" this summer with "Hancock" but you completely undermine any reference to your original article topic by explaining "but the path was so coarse as to be unsuitable for my kids to watch." How is that racially offensive? Have you ever read "Watchmen"? The studios were gunning for a more flawed superhero premise that's become popular in Hollywood.

So now we get to the cringe inducing omissions that you just couldn't take the time out to research. Are you ready?

"The Dark Knight": Tiny Lister played the only sensible person at the clutches of the Joker who puts an end to the madman's decision to let the Gotham law and convicts kill or be killed. He's the buffed up convict who grabs the detonator and decides "Enough is enough; no more killing." Were it not for him, the Joker would have succeeded.

"Iron Man": Terrence Howard as Rhody, the second hand to Tony Stark who made Stark's life easy. And will soon become War Machine, the cooler counterpart of the Iron Man mythos comic book fans love. Were it not for him, Stark would have fallen under the military. And were it not for him, Tony wouldn't have been able to save his hide from the press.

"Iron Man": Yes, the minority influence was powerful as Samuel L. Jackson played Nick Fury the inevitable leader of the super team The Avengers who makes a surprise appearance at the end of "Iron Man." Without Fury, the world wide organization of SHIELD would not work and the Avengers would not come to pass.

"Hell Ride": Eric Balfour played Comanche, a Native American young man who sought out the men who killed his mother and took the reins as the second in command of the motorcycle gang The Victors by the end of "Hell Ride." An all around dignified hero who never submitted to stereotypes unless it meant intimidating an enemy.

Morgan Freeman in "The Dark Knight" and "Wanted" as an amoral assassin run by the loom of fate teaching our young Caucasian hero everything he knew, AND as the moral center Lucius Fox who saw the corruption of caucasian millionaire Bruce Wayne as Batman and stood up to him deciding he should cut out his big brother tactics.

"Get Smart": Masi Oka played the better half of Bruce and Lloyd, a tech geek from "Get Smart" who invented gadgets for Maxwell Smart and spawned his own spin off with his partner in a much advertised DVD release.

"Sisterhood 2" America Ferrera reprised her much talked about role in the sequel as Carmen Lowell, a role she stole the spotlight with from the three Caucasian actresses in the story.

And there's a chance I'm missing some names, too. Now you're likely insisting that this is for headlined films, but you'll then just contradict the thesis of your article with the inclusion of Jennifer Hudson brandishing her as a modern Hattie McDaniel, which is not only an absurdity on a level that's mind blowing but insulting to Ms. Hudson who likely put a lot in to her role. The very mention of actual racist fare to pad and lend credence to your article is insulting to minorities and speaking as one, I think you do us an injustice.

So, to you Mr. Ridley I say... Give us a Break.

 

Reproduction and reprinting should only occur with express written permission
and proper credit to Cinema Crazed and its authors.
 

Have something to say about this article? Pop on over to Cinema-Lunatics
and speak your mind in our
Answer Back! Forums >>

 


[   Digg!   |   Link to Us   |   FAQ   |   Top^   |   AddThis Social Bookmark Button   ]

All written reviews material and content are a copyright of Felix Vasquez Jr. and Cinema Crazed.
Content borrowed without written permission will not be permitted.

¤ ¤ ¤